October 11, 2007
Updated 00:59:04 (Mla time)
Ronnel Domingo
Inquirer Agence France-Presse
MANILA, Philippines--FAMILIES of Overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) tend to just sit back and wait for remittances, apparently content with that kind of life, according to results of a survey conducted by Nielsen Media Research (NMR) Philippines.
While the majority of OFW households belong to the lower-income group, most of them prefer not to have other sources of income, Jay G. Bautista, NMR Philippines executive director, said Wednesday.
At least 813,000 families benefit from remittances and most of them belong to the DE class, which accounts for 64 percent of the population.
"Two out of [every] three respondents are stay-at-home housewives, who are not working," Bautista said. "Four out of [every] five receive remittances monthly, which on the average is P20,000 or less."
Last year, the remittances amounted to $12.8 billion.
The survey covered a total of 300 respondents 18 years old and above in Metro Manila and other key urban centers in Luzon, Metro Cebu and Davao City. They were interviewed personally between February and March.
Nielsen said the OFW remittances helped widen the ranks of the middle class in the country.
Some 23 percent of families who have relatives working abroad now belong to the middle class, Bautista told a news conference.
Not in business
By comparison just 11 percent of the Philippine population without relatives working abroad are considered middle class and 84 percent poor.
The survey also found that a big majority of OFW families were not engaged in any business.
"Just almost a third of OFW beneficiaries own a business, which tend to be sari-sari (neighborhood variety) stores, renting out apartments, operating public transportation, buying and selling, [running] a meat shop, canteen or eateries," Bautista said.
The 35 percent who said they planned to put up businesses mentioned a sari-sari store, Internet café, renting out apartments, canteens or eateries, or "agri-business"--their top five choices.
Pull of spending at malls
Nine out of every 10 respondents said they went to malls, supermarkets and fast-food outlets.
"This could mean that malls are where they receive the remittances, which is an environment where the pull of spending is very high," Bautista said.
He said 61 percent of the respondents received money through banks; 23.6 percent, door-to-door; 18.4 percent, remittance centers; and, 3.6 percent, friends and employment agency.
"As for budgeting, 94.6 percent say the money is for household expenses; 62 percent say it is for education expenses; half say it is for medical costs; and 14 percent say it is for paying the rent," Bautista said.
Asked what they intended to buy or invest in over the next 12 months, 18 percent said they would go for real estate; 11.4 percent said they would buy high-tech gadgets like mobile phones, digital cameras and home video players; and 11.3 percent would buy a vehicle; 10.8 percent wanted household appliances. Only 7 percent mentioned saving some money in the bank.
Father, mother, children
Among families of OFWs, 36 percent have a father abroad, 28.5 percent, a daughter; 17.8 percent, a son; 11.7 percent, a mother; and 12.5 percent, a relative.
Their usual occupations are domestic helper, caregiver, seaman, nurse and factory worker.
Most of the OFWs are in Saudi Arabia, the United States, Taiwan, United Arab Emirates and Japan.
The respondents said their OFW relative had been away for less than a year (22 percent); one to three years (31 percent); four to six years (28 percent); and 10 years or longer (22 percent).
A little more than third (36.2 percent) of the OFWs come home once every two years. Others do so yearly (21.6 percent), twice yearly (10.8 percent) and still others come less often (9.3 percent.)
Migration
Asked about their plans, 27 percent said they hoped to migrate--the choice destinations being North America (seven out of 10), East Asia, Oceania, Europe and Middle East.
"There were 73 percent who said they would stay here," Bautista said. "But this could be an indication that they are content on carrying on with their current lot."
Internet
Only 13 percent of families use the Internet to communicate with the OFWs as most wait for the latter to call through their cell phones or the landline.
Still, families of OFWs are relatively more exposed to different media, reflecting the international orientation of their lifestyles.
Everybody has television sets; four out of every five listen to the radio, read newspapers and own VCD or DVD players; and about a third read magazines and go to the movies.
"We have apprised advertisers and business groups such as franchisers of this and we have urged them to communicate more responsibly with these consumers as well as provide them with more options in sustaining their sources of income," Bautista said.
52 Kommentare:
I am part of the statistics, courtesy of my brother in London.
Well, not really. I am just his remittance agent for the family, hehe.
oh, I hope you don't splurge his money with new shoes, dann! Just kidding my friend. I hope you're not pikon at mangakig sa akon... lol
well..i am one of those who sends money all the time not only to my family but to those who needs help...call me mother theresa but am no saint..just an ordinary human being willing to share her blessings..ngahahahaha* But it is a sad knowing some people don't realize how much blood, sweat and tears that are using just to tend to their needs. I just hope in one way or another they would know how to appreciate it, not to think that money are just growing on trees.
but it is also a sad fact that many of our fellow expats spoil their families with all those consumer goods they send. Just think about all those balikbayan boxes. Okey, I've read that it is their way of 'coping' having missed their families so much.
aray! swak na swak jack! ahahah...ako nun sobra magpadala ng balikbayan box! tig ta tatlo..kasi naman para lang makita ko si mom at dad na masaya ako ganon na din.. now, its been three years i have not sent a single one..just money only or let's say small packages...and the ones that they only need, not the one they want. I learned my lesson, teaching them to catch fish instead of catching fish for them. Nakakapagod na din. I need rest for my wallet's sake.
Housewives are working, especially when they have children - and the amount of families who have a father abroad accounts for more than half of these "lazy" women. The rest may be past 50 and finally able to rest after 35+ years of slave-work because their son or daughter supports them from abroad. And women may be more willing to participate in such a survey than men. 300 respondents are not necessarily representative - the group is too small.
This says nothing unless we get more information.
Somebody made a similar comment in another blog where I posted it earlier, Ulla, as preparation for our coming conference in Holland next week. And my answer was, yes, the sampling is rather small. But still the survey result is instructive esp. in the light of the anecdotal stories I've heard last July when I went home.
Ah, you're wiser and richer now, meow?
If you say so. What are we supposed to learn from it, that people won't work unless they have to? Sounds like a matter of course to me when we're speaking about the poor, i.e. uneducated who have no choices of jobs. That they buy status symbols? Yeah - what else is new. That they go to malls (I don't know what kind of question that is)? Yep, that could mean that they get their money there - how about finding that out first?
aha! wiser! but not richer! i wish!!!!
Ah, I'm sleepy now but I'd like to refer you to the discussion in my former post. this is, in a way, an extension to that. It will be my turn to be away for a long, long time (Cyberspacezeit Berechnung). So Auf wieder sehen, liebe, Ulla, und warte auf meine wieder Erscheinung. Ich bin jetzt wirklich muede... gute Nacht.
gute nacht..bon nuit et au revoir mon ami! abientot!
Gute Nacht, lieber Jack.
"Morgen früh, wenn Gott will, wirst du wieder geweckt" - auf Wiedersehen.
i am also part of the stats. i regularly send money back home for amortization of my house, and little part of it to aid my family. i believe with the kind of economic climate back home, there are not much options for these ofw families.
Hehehe... How ironic that you would post this, I just had this conversation with a client. He was telling me about a GRO sent to Japan who remits money back to her family for the use of reconstructing their house. But instead, the family (which consists of mother, father, dead-beat sister, dead-beat brother-in-law, and three nephews/nieces) who haven't bothered to go find work for themselves after the GRO left for Japan, use her monthly remittance for day-to-day living and have only spent the amount for minimal structural changes on the house.
And they complain all the time that she never sends back enough.
But that's one isolated incident. :) I hope it's not true for most families of OFW's
I have seen some signs showing that it is not an isolated case. Can't divulge any details in the public, though.
why so,Bong? Stats are stats, you don't need to name people.
haha
He feeds my shoes affliction tho. He always buys me rubber shoes everytime he comes home.. Dili pa guba ang daan, naa na sab ko'y bag-o.. This December, he's getting me a North Face.. weeeeh
Oh Mommie Teresa, I need help.
I need new shoes.
haha
when a husband or a wife works abroad, it makes sense for one fo the parents to take care of the children. if both of them works abroad, it would be as if they have totally abandoned the children. spending time with children is a really, really good investment.
whaaa, you have a new camera, now new shoes! That's too much for me to bear, dann, whaaaaaaaa
but that's the sad reality, dave, I know many of my friends who as husband and wife went to the US and leave their children with the grandparents. They just send their children boxes of gifts and, of course, dollars to pay for their guilt. Sad, sad.
i already see a few loopholes from this segment alone.
1) 300 respondents out of 813,000 families? that's too small to be a representative sample. and how did they choose the respondents? did they say anything about their sampling methods?
2) they focused on urban centers. why not get respondents from the rural areas too where the spending and saving patterns may be different?
3) stay at home housewives who are not working? is there such a thing? who takes care of the kids? cooks their meals? cleans the house? manages the budget? does the grocery shopping? allocates the resources? brings them to school? helps them with their homework? does the laundry and the ironing? feeds the pets? nurses the kids when they're sick? disciplines them when they misbehave? compensates for the absence of the father?
i agree though, that they should be taught how to manage their finances. all the banks in the philippines offer equity funds that you can invest in, and they reap a much higher yield than time deposits.
i agree, you have to compensate for the absence of the other parent.
Ulla says more or less the same comment you had, Pat! And I also questioned the rather unrepresentative sampling. That said, this study could be instructive to our policy makers and us expats.
We're on the same page here, Pat!
oh sorry, i didn't read the thread before i typed my reply.
he...he... you're not alone. Who likes to read threads before commenting :-)?
there is one group in cebu though, the friends of pedro, who are teaching the families of ofw's financial management (thru seminars), as well as communication techniques (for lack of a better term) so that family bonds will be strengthened despite the distance. they have a website, which also offers religious inputs and activities for ofw's in non-christian countries. the group that organized this also teaches the families how to chat thru instant messaging clients like ym and msm so they can talk to the family member abroad.
hahahaha! right you are jack. =) but isn't that like reading the reviews before you read the book? =) i'd rather judge the book for myself.
care to give me their site? Sounds interesting this guy Pedro?
blessed pedro calungsod was a cebuano who went abroad to help missionaries and got martyred. so they're touting him to be the patron saint of ofw's i think. the website is friendsofpedro.net
salamat, I'll take a peep right away.
oh, i just saw that they have articles on financial planning in their website, under ofw matters
ooops, Pedro's site looks too religious- let alone catholic- for my taste. But, thanks got it already in my "sites to watch" list.
hahaha, well, since majority of ofw's are catholic, i don't think they'll mind.
luckily, only in name, like me LOL
haha, let's not go there. =)
of course, I will. I'm an incurable 'socializer', I go where the people are. If ever I have the time I'd go to the monthly mass organized by Pinays here. The old Filipino priest didn like me but, well, the feeling was mutual. He's gone back now but the temporary priest assigned to us from - all of places- Tanzania is very progressive so I like to give him a little bit of support to counter some not so pleasant tendencies of some of our countrymen and women not to be so fond of Blacks- even the ones wearing white garbs.
hehhe..
No, no, the camera isn't mine. Mine will still pop-out from my laptop screen in November.. Pero hapit na..
hehe, what i meant was, let's not get into that topic. =)
ops, my foot in the mouth. So, shut up, Jack :-(
nah, go ahead and ramble on jack. i have nothing better to do anyway. it's leftover night.
aha, the efficient super housewife!!!
it only works if your spouse doesn't mind reruns though. =)
your talking to a colleague sitting opposite in the gender divide :-) Ah, we're both lucky then he..he..
precisely why i used the gender neutral term. =) unfortunately, even if my hubby doesn't mind eating leftovers, i do. so i usually rework it a bit just so the food doesn't look the same as it did the last time i served it.
dear ANAK,
practice the virtue of patience. MANIGAS KA muna. hrhrhrrhh
It seems that Nielsen is GOING DOWN THE DRAIN. This is the kind of study that perpetuates the telenovela mentality which a lot of Pinoys are so fond of. How in the world does 300 people become a significant sample set in a country of 80 million with 8 million outside the country - for them to make an announcement like this?! I agree with Pat and Ulla. This is not even statistically significant. Here in the UAE, AC Nielsen would at least require a thousand respondents (in a population size of 2M people) for the study to be considered valid.
A lot of sweeping conclusions here - again we're back to the era when MOST OFW's are domestics, caregiver and seamen. Judging by their conclusions, I don't see how OFW money could fuel a huge part of the real estate boom in the country - if most of the money is being spent on household expenses? Now tell that to Ayala Land and the other big developers who are making a killing on this segment.
I don;t know about the family members in the homeland who seem to be laggards happy to just receive the fruits of somebody elses labor. But these kind of conclusions based on flimsy data create needless bias - and most of the time, the bias is against the OFWs.
I know of at least three similar cases. But I dont consider it representative statistics. I just wanted to say that it is not "isolated".
Kommentar veröffentlichen